Comments - Verifying Online Sources - A Genwise discussion - The Douglas Archives2024-03-28T16:45:48Zhttps://douglashistory.ning.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=3482022%3ABlogPost%3A1601&xn_auth=nogood to hear from you again,…tag:douglashistory.ning.com,2009-09-08:3482022:Comment:18222009-09-08T10:16:42.000ZWilliam Douglashttps://douglashistory.ning.com/profile/WilliamDouglas
good to hear from you again, Daryl,<br />
<br />
I hope the Douglas Archives is not one of them?<br />
<br />
Incidently, I think I got the GMT time wrong for the webchat - it should have been 2am the next morning! I think! I must learn how to work out this conversion thing.
good to hear from you again, Daryl,<br />
<br />
I hope the Douglas Archives is not one of them?<br />
<br />
Incidently, I think I got the GMT time wrong for the webchat - it should have been 2am the next morning! I think! I must learn how to work out this conversion thing. Couldn't agree with you more…tag:douglashistory.ning.com,2009-09-08:3482022:Comment:18212009-09-08T09:58:39.000ZDaryl John Douglasshttps://douglashistory.ning.com/profile/DarylJohnDouglass
Couldn't agree with you more William. I thought I'd found my long lost link until I did some digging and found that if it were true, then my William's father was 15 and his mother was 5 at the time of his birth. Despite this, there are at least six family trees on the William Douglass line in Australia that carry this error<br />
cheers<br />
Daryl Douglass
Couldn't agree with you more William. I thought I'd found my long lost link until I did some digging and found that if it were true, then my William's father was 15 and his mother was 5 at the time of his birth. Despite this, there are at least six family trees on the William Douglass line in Australia that carry this error<br />
cheers<br />
Daryl Douglass